The Intersection of Family Law Parenting Plans and Dependency (CPS) Cases

The Intersection of Family Law Parenting Plans and Dependency (CPS) Cases

A parenting plan is the order the family law court enters, most typically in cases of divorce and legal separation, to govern when the child(ren) will live with each parent. But what happens to a parenting plan when a child is removed from the home by CPS and dependency case is established?

The dependency court under Washington State law has exclusive original jurisdiction over all matters relating to children alleged or found to be “dependent.” See RCW 13.04.030. This means that the moment a dependency case is filed, the dependency court orders are exclusively what govern the child’s placement and visitation. Thus, a dependency court action temporarily suspends any other orders impacting the children, including a parenting plan, that would otherwise govern that child’s placement or contact with parents. The dependency court can order that the parenting plan be followed, however.

A dependency case does not automatically alter or terminate other family law orders, though the court can sometimes do so if it finds such a change to be in the child’s best interests. Thus, if the dependency court does nothing to alter a preexisting parenting plan, that parenting plan will “come back to life” and be in effect after dismissal of the dependency case unless the dependency court orders otherwise.

While the law does not explicitly require the dependency court to modify or establish a protective family law parenting plan before dismissal of every dependency case, in practice the court will often require that such a modification or establishment occur prior to dismissing the dependency. This is because the court is always required to rule in the child’s best interests, with child safety being its paramount consideration. Usually, in King County, after successful return home to a parent, the dependency court will require that parent to obtain a family law parenting plan that is protective of the child and reflective of the parents’ progress within the dependency case.

A common example for why this happens is the following scenario:

1. Parent A gets the child successfully returned home to them and otherwise meets the requirements for dismissal of the dependency.

2. The dependency court remains concerned about Parent B’s parental fitness, and has only allowed them supervised contact for the duration of the dependency case.

There is no preexisting parenting plan in family law court to govern the child’s custody and visitation.

3. If the dependency case is dismissed, there is thus no court order protecting the child from Parent B, and Parent B may even technically be able to pick the child up from school one day.

4. Because of this, the dependency court grants “concurrent jurisdiction” (permission) for the family law court to establish a protective parenting plan while the case is still open.

The dependency court only then dismisses the dependency case once it sees that there will be a post-dismissal parenting plan to protect the child from Parent B.

Parties in a dependency case will often argue in court whether a parenting plan is needed for dismissal of the case. In practice, at least in King County, an updated parenting plan reflective of the parents’ progress within the dependency case will often be required by the dependency court prior to dismissal. Because the dependency court by law has exclusive original jurisdiction over children found or alleged to be dependent, other family law orders like a parenting plan are put on hold pending the resolution of the dependency case. 

If you have questions about parenting plans and/or dependency cases, you can email us at eliseb@elisebuiefamilylaw.com or call 206-926-9848.

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletters

 
Subscribe to one or more of our newsletters, delivering meaningful insight on topics that matter to you and your family.
ebl home subscribe image

FURTHER READING

Latest Blog Posts

Washington family law usually encourages parents to work out differences between themselves without involving the judicial system. Child support modification is different. Informal side agreements, even written agreements, are unenforceable in family court. So, when circumstances change accordingly, as outlined…

Reducing one’s tax obligations is a significant factor in many financial decisions, including those you make as part of your estate planning. When you get far enough into the details of your estate plan, though, you may find that tax…

If you ask those who have survived domestic violence why they stayed in abusive situations as long as they did, it is often not because they did not realize that what was happening to them was abuse. People who have…

Learn from a Seattle family law attorney how to find the right collaborative divorce lawyer for your Washington state divorce.

Learn from an experienced Seattle divorce lawyer about the benefits of collaborative divorce over litigation.

A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney describes the differences between collaborative divorce and divorce mediation.

A Seattle estate planning attorney can help guide you about who to choose for key roles in your estate plan.

A prenuptial agreement, or a “prenup,” can help you and your future spouse decide how to handle certain financial issues in your lives before they cause conflict and hurt feelings. This is true even if you believe you would never…

A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney describes what happens when negotiations break down in a collaborative divorce.

A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney details tips and tricks for Washington state single parents.