What Does a Box Of Chocolate Have to Do with Relocation?

Who Gets the Embryos?

Your Box of Chocolates – Choose wisely

It’s not all a matter of law and presumptions – relocation that actually serves the child’s best interest is also a matter of sacrifice, selflessness, sharing and doing what is right for the children without regard to what might be “fair” or “reasonable.” Though the relocating parent might not know what their box of chocolates will offer, the relocating parent needs to ask some very important questions before biting into one.

The specific factors that should be considered before picking a chocolate and renting a UHAUL are as follows:

  1. Time actually spent with the non-custodial parent? Sometimes children have increased contact with the non-custodial parent if that parent was not very involved before the move because now there are longer blocks of time to spend together.
  2. Look at the custodial parent’s support system in the new environment. Very little research has been done on healthy remarriages and the adjustment of children but the improved support system is likely a benefit to the child.
  3. Is the relocating parent going to enjoy enough of a socioeconomic benefit because of the move that it will impact the children positively?
  4. Can both parents effectively parent alone?
  5. Do the parents effectively communicate and cooperate?
  6. What resources exist to handle travel costs?
  7. Is there a conduct disorder or behaviors in the non-custodial parent that make the move a protective factor?
  8. How old is the child? Generally a child needs to be at least 6-8 years old to be able to maintain appropriate attachments.

After consideration of these factors, the UHAUL is rented and the chocolate piece is selected, here comes the bite. What is in the middle of that chocolate?

Imagine a relocation based on the custodial mother’s desire to move and remarry. Imagine the non-custodial father agreeing that relocation is in the children’s best interest. Imagine a relocation where children are allowed to see their non-custodial father any time they like with only seven days notice to buy a ticket, or where the non-custodial father flies to the new children’s home whenever asked, stays in their home (the custodial mom and new husband stay out of the house), drives their car and is able to experience life in the new locale alongside the children in their new environment. The non-custodial father attends sporting events, meets their friends, schedules meetings with their teachers, helps them learn to drive, walks the family dog that used to live with all of them. Imagine a relocation where the mother provides the non-custodial father sporting tickets to local events so that he and the children can enjoy the local sports scene together. Imagine a relocation where the children are all provided smart phones so that they can call, text, email, or skype with their non-custodial father at any time desired. Imagine a relocation in which the children are allowed to spend any and all holidays with their non-custodial father, any portion or all of the summer with their non-custodial father, and any and all vacation time with their non-custodial father. Imagine all of this despite monthly grounds for court-action on child support. Imagine this relocation with zero contribution to college costs despite a signed agreement to the contrary, zero contribution to reimbursable expenses and consistently late and unpaid child support. These imaginary kids have hit the jackpot – a relocating parent who understands the importance of the relationship with both parents despite the obstacles. (Let’s not forget the sainthood of the stepfather who agrees to support the children’s best interest alongside this imagined-custodial mother).

The bottom line is: the relocation in our imagined scenario was for the relocating custodial mother so all suffering must ideally be borne by that relocating mother – not the children and not the non-custodial father. The idea that there will be a benefit to the relocating parent such that it will trickle down to the children only exists if the relocating parent truly understands the social science on relocation and its impact on children and thus is willing to do whatever it takes, and I mean, whatever, to make the relocation serve the child’s best interest – not the custodial mother’s best interest.   You might not like coconut filling but if that is your chosen chocolate, you had better figure out how to make the best of it.

Just like all things kid-related, this stage will pass – all too often; it will pass far faster than any parent envisioned. So, my best advice as a family law practitioner, relocated custodial mother and avid chocolate lover, before planning any move, consider not only the legalities of relocation but also the emotional and financial toll that it should have (and will have) on the parent choosing the relocation as well as the impacts on the children and the non-relocating parent. Relocation is as big of a decision as the divorce itself. Divorce and relocation are adult decisions that have profound impacts on the children involved. Thus, the relocation consequences that flow should be borne by the relocating parent as much as possible, not the innocent children and not the non-relocating parent.

Don’t pack that UHAUL and don’t bite into the chocolate unless you are willing to act in your child’s best interest over and over and over again even if it never seems fair. I can assure you, divorce and relocation are not fair in your child’s eyes either.


Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe to one or more of our newsletters, delivering meaningful insight on topics that matter to you and your family.
ebl home subscribe image


Latest Blog Posts

Child support is one of the most contentious issues in divorce cases where parties have minor children. Even though Washington state law uses the same complex mathematical formula to determine the amount of child support for each child, there is…

Family law and estate planning often intersect. This is particularly true when contemplating divorce, remarriage, or blending families.

At some point during your divorce case, friends and family members whose own marriages ended in divorce probably told you that it gets better, and it does. Of course, from your perspective, getting out of a bad marriage might be…

Co-parenting over a long distance when you are a non-residential parent does not have to equate to sacrificing involvement in your children’s lives. But it likely does mean you will have to make tweaks in your communication and parenting style to accommodate the new living arrangement.

If you have a significant amount of money saved, you might be considering giving some of it away while you are still alive via what is known in estate planning jargon as a living inheritance. Depending on your desires, you can give your beneficiaries a portion of or all of the inheritance you intend to give them.

Estate planning is commonly associated with preparing for asset distribution and financial management in the event of the estate plan owner’s incapacitation or death. However, an estate plan can protect more than just people and what they have worked so hard during their lifetimes to build. A carefully crafted Washington state estate plan can also protect pets.

Despite being divorced, you may still be able to collect social security benefits through your ex-spouse. Even if you went through a high-conflict divorce or are not on good terms with your ex-spouse currently, they cannot stop you from collecting these benefits if you are eligible. Likewise, your ex-spouse does not need to permit you to apply for social security benefits or have previously completed an application themselves.

If you live in Washington State and have an estranged family member, are you worried about them contesting your will after you die? Well, don’t worry quite yet. There are a variety of criteria an individual must meet to contest a will in the state of Washington.

Depending on your situation, there might also be measures you can take as you revisit your existing estate plan or create a new one to cause them to think twice about doing so. Here is what you need to know about whether an estranged family member can contest a will in Washington state.

When parents go through a divorce, child custody can be one of the hardest issues to deal with. But increasingly in American households, pets are part of the family, and separating can create similar concerns over who gets the family pet.

As a Seattle entrepreneur, you’ve undoubtedly dedicated countless hours and resources to building a successful business. You’ve dotted all of your I’s and crossed all of your T’s. But have you considered what will happen to your business after you're…