In follow up to last week’s post regarding the somewhat surreal Ginsburg v. Trump headlines, it appears the longtime Supreme Court Justice to a limited extent agrees with much of the backlash against her, admitting that judges should “avoid commenting on a candidate for public office” and that her remarks were “ill advised.” She expressed regret and noted she will be “more circumspect” in the future. Notably she did not appear to render the apology to Trump himself, but more so to the institution of judges and their role as (theoretically) neutral deciders. Additionally, her expression of remorse for her public comments is perhaps as unprecedented as the comments themselves. Per the New York Times, legal scholars could not remember a time an active justice so publicly expressed regret for something they said. While it remains to be seen the long-term effect her recent comments and apology may have on her legacy or the public view of the Supreme Court, it seems fitting that the second female justice in history who is otherwise also known for being unique and mold-breaking would have such an unprecedented couple of weeks.
STAY UP TO DATE
Subscribe to our newsletters
FURTHER READING
Latest Blog Posts
Washington family law usually encourages parents to work out differences between themselves without involving the judicial system. Child support modification is different. Informal side agreements, even written agreements, are unenforceable in family court. So, when circumstances change accordingly, as outlined…
Reducing one’s tax obligations is a significant factor in many financial decisions, including those you make as part of your estate planning. When you get far enough into the details of your estate plan, though, you may find that tax…
If you ask those who have survived domestic violence why they stayed in abusive situations as long as they did, it is often not because they did not realize that what was happening to them was abuse. People who have…
Learn from a Seattle family law attorney how to find the right collaborative divorce lawyer for your Washington state divorce.
Learn from an experienced Seattle divorce lawyer about the benefits of collaborative divorce over litigation.
A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney describes the differences between collaborative divorce and divorce mediation.
A Seattle estate planning attorney can help guide you about who to choose for key roles in your estate plan.
A prenuptial agreement, or a “prenup,” can help you and your future spouse decide how to handle certain financial issues in your lives before they cause conflict and hurt feelings. This is true even if you believe you would never…
A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney describes what happens when negotiations break down in a collaborative divorce.
A skilled and experienced Seattle family law attorney details tips and tricks for Washington state single parents.