Elise Buie Family Law | Changes Proposed to Custody Laws

Elise Buie Family Law  |  Changes Proposed to Custody Laws

About 20 states across the US are currently considering proposed legislation that would alter the procedures for determining which parent will retain legal and physical control of a child following a divorce or separation. 

These laws have been promoted by advocacy groups who content that fathers have long been disadvantaged in the custody decision making process. These groups claim that even with laws that are designed to make decisions in the best interest of the child, mothers end up heavily favored by the system. 

n Washington and New York, proposed legislation would require judges to award equal parenting time to both parent unless there is proof that this arrangement would not be in the best interest of the child.

The current standard in the state of Washington is to apportion custody based on the best interests of the child. Parents are expected to develop a parenting plan prior to a custody hearing, which the court must then approve. One or both parents of a child may be granted legal or physical custody of a child. Legal custody refers to the ability to make decisions on behalf of the child, such as which school they will attend and what medical treatment they will receive. Physical custody refers to the time spent residing with either parent.

The ‘best interests of the child’ standard means that the court will examine factors such as each parents proximity to the child, the extent to which a parent participates in the decision-making process for a child, and the ability of parents to work cooperatively to make such decisions. 

Some groups have expressed serious concerns over making the proposed legislative change in Washington. Proponents of the law claim that the groups opposed (such as family lawyers and bar associations) are merely acting in self-interest, attempting to preserve a litigious court process for solving custody issues. However, opposing groups claim that setting a formula that automatically splits custody could take discretion out of the hands of judges and force the courts to give parenting time to abusive fathers. In addition, they claim that requiring couples who end up a custody hearing to have equal parenting time are illogical, as those who end up litigating custody issues are couples with a relationship that is so contentious that these issues could not be resolved through a collaborative alternative dispute resolution process such as mediation.

Given that major legislative changes are pending in so many states, we could be looking at a significant nationwide shift in custody law in the coming year.


Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe to one or more of our newsletters, delivering meaningful insight on topics that matter to you and your family.
ebl home subscribe image


Latest Blog Posts

Child support is one of the most contentious issues in divorce cases where parties have minor children. Even though Washington state law uses the same complex mathematical formula to determine the amount of child support for each child, there is…

Family law and estate planning often intersect. This is particularly true when contemplating divorce, remarriage, or blending families.

At some point during your divorce case, friends and family members whose own marriages ended in divorce probably told you that it gets better, and it does. Of course, from your perspective, getting out of a bad marriage might be…

Co-parenting over a long distance when you are a non-residential parent does not have to equate to sacrificing involvement in your children’s lives. But it likely does mean you will have to make tweaks in your communication and parenting style to accommodate the new living arrangement.

If you have a significant amount of money saved, you might be considering giving some of it away while you are still alive via what is known in estate planning jargon as a living inheritance. Depending on your desires, you can give your beneficiaries a portion of or all of the inheritance you intend to give them.

Estate planning is commonly associated with preparing for asset distribution and financial management in the event of the estate plan owner’s incapacitation or death. However, an estate plan can protect more than just people and what they have worked so hard during their lifetimes to build. A carefully crafted Washington state estate plan can also protect pets.

Despite being divorced, you may still be able to collect social security benefits through your ex-spouse. Even if you went through a high-conflict divorce or are not on good terms with your ex-spouse currently, they cannot stop you from collecting these benefits if you are eligible. Likewise, your ex-spouse does not need to permit you to apply for social security benefits or have previously completed an application themselves.

If you live in Washington State and have an estranged family member, are you worried about them contesting your will after you die? Well, don’t worry quite yet. There are a variety of criteria an individual must meet to contest a will in the state of Washington.

Depending on your situation, there might also be measures you can take as you revisit your existing estate plan or create a new one to cause them to think twice about doing so. Here is what you need to know about whether an estranged family member can contest a will in Washington state.

When parents go through a divorce, child custody can be one of the hardest issues to deal with. But increasingly in American households, pets are part of the family, and separating can create similar concerns over who gets the family pet.

As a Seattle entrepreneur, you’ve undoubtedly dedicated countless hours and resources to building a successful business. You’ve dotted all of your I’s and crossed all of your T’s. But have you considered what will happen to your business after you're…