Seattle Moving Towards a City-Funded “Safe Consumption Site” for Heroin Addicts – Guest Blogger

Seattle Moving Towards a City-Funded “Safe Consumption Site” for Heroin Addicts – Guest Blogger

On any given day in our beautiful city you are likely to come across a homeless addict, no matter what neighborhood you live in. Their drug of choice is usually heroin, which makes a certain amount of sad sense because it provides the biggest bang for your buck and has become far too easy to obtain.

Now you know the problem; there are homeless people using heroin in every corner of the city, the solution is much less succinct.

The majority of leaders on Seattle’s heroin task force (yes, we have a heroin task force) are pushing for what they call a “safe consumption site,” where heroin addicts can continue to do heroin but this time they will have medical supervision and a safe location provided by your hard earned dollars. They claim that this would be a good idea because “the city would see a lot fewer syringes on the street and a lot fewer people dying from using drugs.” (Seattle Times)

To that I say: duh. Of course there would be fewer syringes out and about and fewer overdoses if we endorsed a safe haven of heroin use, is that really a viable solution? I can’t seem to follow our task force’s thought process that led to the conclusion that we ought to use tax payer money to make sure addicts users are safe while shooting heroin between their toes.

I cannot claim to be an expert on the subject of heroin use but it seems to me that there are inherent risks that go along with that decision. These include but unfortunately are not limited to; a life of poverty, overdosing, dying, and being looked down upon by the general populace and I don’t see why we should take any efforts to alleviate these consequences.

I do somewhat see the reasoning behind the argument that these sites would be beneficial in shielding the general public from seeing this epidemic actually take place in front of them on a daily basis but I really believe that the negatives far outweigh the positives even on this point of contention. Shielding people from the issues that surround them only makes them forget that the issue really exists, and in turn won’t help our city address the real issue at hand. If this were a concern of public safety there would be vastly different dialogue surrounding this topic because the reality of the situation is homeless addicts rarely cause any quantifiable harm to Seattle’s citizens and our money would be better spent trying to attack this issue an attempt to stop it, not condone it to rage on in hiding.


Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe to one or more of our newsletters, delivering meaningful insight on topics that matter to you and your family.
ebl home subscribe image


Latest Blog Posts

Child support is one of the most contentious issues in divorce cases where parties have minor children. Even though Washington state law uses the same complex mathematical formula to determine the amount of child support for each child, there is…

Family law and estate planning often intersect. This is particularly true when contemplating divorce, remarriage, or blending families.

At some point during your divorce case, friends and family members whose own marriages ended in divorce probably told you that it gets better, and it does. Of course, from your perspective, getting out of a bad marriage might be…

Co-parenting over a long distance when you are a non-residential parent does not have to equate to sacrificing involvement in your children’s lives. But it likely does mean you will have to make tweaks in your communication and parenting style to accommodate the new living arrangement.

If you have a significant amount of money saved, you might be considering giving some of it away while you are still alive via what is known in estate planning jargon as a living inheritance. Depending on your desires, you can give your beneficiaries a portion of or all of the inheritance you intend to give them.

Estate planning is commonly associated with preparing for asset distribution and financial management in the event of the estate plan owner’s incapacitation or death. However, an estate plan can protect more than just people and what they have worked so hard during their lifetimes to build. A carefully crafted Washington state estate plan can also protect pets.

Despite being divorced, you may still be able to collect social security benefits through your ex-spouse. Even if you went through a high-conflict divorce or are not on good terms with your ex-spouse currently, they cannot stop you from collecting these benefits if you are eligible. Likewise, your ex-spouse does not need to permit you to apply for social security benefits or have previously completed an application themselves.

If you live in Washington State and have an estranged family member, are you worried about them contesting your will after you die? Well, don’t worry quite yet. There are a variety of criteria an individual must meet to contest a will in the state of Washington.

Depending on your situation, there might also be measures you can take as you revisit your existing estate plan or create a new one to cause them to think twice about doing so. Here is what you need to know about whether an estranged family member can contest a will in Washington state.

When parents go through a divorce, child custody can be one of the hardest issues to deal with. But increasingly in American households, pets are part of the family, and separating can create similar concerns over who gets the family pet.

As a Seattle entrepreneur, you’ve undoubtedly dedicated countless hours and resources to building a successful business. You’ve dotted all of your I’s and crossed all of your T’s. But have you considered what will happen to your business after you're…